The shaming of Sharon
1/11/2003
ARIEL SHARON is not
in trouble because his rivals resent him or because of a political conspiracy,
as he alleged Thursday in a tirade on television and radio - before Israel's
Central Elections Committee cut off the broadcast, saying that the prime
minister had violated Israel's law against political propaganda on the
air within 60 days of an election.
Sharon and his Likud
Party are sinking swiftly in polling surveys because of two separate scandals,
one involving charges of vote-buying within Likud and the other a complex
affair of receiving campaign funds from what might have been an American
shell company and paying the money back with convoluted loans that culminated
in $1.5 million being transferred in suspicious stages to Sharon's sons
from a family friend in South Africa.
The Israeli daily
Ha'aretz, the newspaper that broke the story about the campaign finance
investigation of Sharon and his two sons, crystallized the damage that
has been done to Sharon in an impertinent headline: ''Pinocchio heads
for the polls.'' This is the nub of the problem for Sharon and his party:
He is losing a politician's most indispensable asset - his credibility.
Sharon has campaigned
as a straightforward military man who might not have been able to bring
Israelis the security he promised two years ago but who still has more
integrity than his opponents - those within Likud as well as those in
the peace camp. Now his promises about peace, security, and prosperity
are becoming as questionable as his integrity in the matter of campaign
debts and loans from foreign sources. Under the floodlights of Israel's
unruly democracy, Sharon appears to have squandered much of the trust
his party had been counting on to carry Likud to a big victory in the
election scheduled for Jan. 28. The latest poll - taken before Sharon's
truncated tirade Thursday - showed Likud dropping from a November projection
of 41 seats in the 120-member Knesset to 27, a mere three seats more than
Labor is projected to receive.
Sharon is being investigated
by the National Fraud Squad of the Israeli police on suspicion of bribe-taking,
fraud, and breach of trust. He has tried to shift the public's focus from
his financial entanglements to the question of who leaked the fact of
the investigation. As some of his critics in Israel are saying, he owes
the public a satisfactory explanation of his actions.
As things stand, Sharon
is aligning himself against an Israeli expectation that political leaders
will set an example of respect for the law. On April 10, 1977, the late
Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin resigned over a much less serious breach
of trust - the disclosure that his wife held a checking account in a bank
in the United States. More than ever, Israelis need a leader in the mold
of Rabin.
|