The usual extremists immediately pounced on the Geneva Accord as an act of treason to their respective causes. Palestinian radicals predictably focused on the provisions that effectively deny Palestinian refugees a blanket right of return to former homes in what is now Israel, though such a step has long been inevitable. Yasir Arafat, who was tacitly behind the negotiations, did what he always does under pressure — he waffled. Israeli hard-liners denounced the sharing of Jerusalem and the evacuation of most settlements. Prime Minister Ariel Sharon made no effort to conceal his hostility for the accord. His spokesman said it was tantamount to suicide by Israel and a "Swiss golden calf" for the Israeli left. The Geneva document is hardly radical. It calls for two neighboring states with two capitals in Jerusalem, the evacuation of most Jewish settlements and the incorporation of the rest into Israel in exchange for an equivalent amount of land. It also calls for a limit, to be set by Israel, on the number of Palestinian refugees who can settle in Israel, and compensation or resettlement for the rest. There is plenty
left to negotiate here. But the fact is that this is more or less
how it has to end. Neither side will have all of Jerusalem. The
Palestinian refugees will not all come back, effectively overwhelming
the Jewish state. Many settlers will have to go. The alternative
is for the antagonists to continue their endless arguments over
whose religion grants what land to whom, and to continue killing
each other, dragging the rest of the world deeper and deeper into
the fray. The principles of the Geneva Accord are the right way
to go. |