Road to optimism
A truce and a withdrawal bolster Mideast hopes
Tuesday, July
01, 2003
Under the watchful
eye of President Bush's personal envoy, the Israelis and Palestinians
are now positioned to make prog-ress in implementation of the road
map to a two-state settlement and sustainable peace in the Middle
East.
But fragility
and the vulnerability of all concerned, Israelis and Palestinians
on the ground and President Bush's administration as the chaperone
of this lethal couple, remain evident. This will not be a straightforward
advance to success. Nor, however, should anyone think that this
problem is impossible.
On the Palestinian
side, the three main groups responsible for the suicide attacks
and other violence have promised to respect a 90-day moratorium
on attacks on Israelis. The Israeli side has agreed to withdraw
its forces from northern Gaza and turn responsibility for security
there over to Palestinian forces. The Israelis have begun their
withdrawal.
The question
now on the Palestinian side is the ability of its leadership to
exercise sufficient control over its militants and fighters to see
that the pledge of 90 days of peace is respected.
On Israel's
side, the question is whether its forces will respect their end
of the agreement if, for example, a choice opportunity to kill a
Hamas militant leader presents itself or some Palestinian -- perhaps
even rogue, outside the control of the Palestinian Authority, Hamas,
Islamic Jihad or the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades -- carries out some
ghastly attack against Israelis. At that point, nearby Israel Defense
Forces tanks could easily roll right back into northern Gaza.
The basic question
again becomes, what real good will exists at the top on the two
sides? And how solid is the control that the leadership of both
sides exerts over its people?
On the Palestinian
side, one knows the face of the danger to the tentative accord;
it is in the fresh-faced, fixed stare of the fanatic, ready to blow
himself or herself to pieces for the Palestinian cause. On the Israeli
side, it is a settler who firmly believes that all of the area where
Israel can exert military control, including Gaza and the West Bank,
somehow belongs to Israel, in spite of the need for peace and sharing
of the land to achieve long-term peace and security in the area.
As far as the
United States is concerned, it is the task of Mr. Bush to look these
risks in the eye and persist in making the road map work. If either
or both the Palestinians and the Israelis are not acting in good
faith, the United States is nonetheless firmly signed on through
the American president's direct role in the proceedings, ripe to
don a dunce cap in the event of failure.
Given the pre-eminent
role of the United States in the world and particularly in the Middle
East, in spite of the risks this issue is a cup that cannot pass
from us.
Copyright ©1997-2003
PG Publishing Co., Inc.
|