
Leaving Gaza
February 4, 2004
There is no better symbol of Israeli determination in the face of long odds
than the tiny enclaves populated by about 7,800 Jews who are surrounded
by about 1.3 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. Nor is there a better
symbol of Israeli obstinacy than its maintainence of these settlements at
great cost in lives and military resources for little if any benefit.
The Gaza settlements are a daily provocation for surrounding Palestinians,
an ever-present flash point in the ongoing Mideast conflict, a certain way
to keep tensions at a constant boil. The Israelis who live in Gaza are under
relentless threat; guarding them is a heavy drain on Israel's army. Settlers
must be escorted in bulletproof buses or armored transport vehicles just
to make a trip to the grocery store or dentist. These settlements make no
sense.
Appearing to acknowledge this reality, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon said
Monday that he has issued orders to plan for the removal of 17 Jewish settlements
from the Gaza Strip. Sharon couched his move in terms of his pledge several
weeks ago to unilaterally separate from the Palestinians if there is no
progress on the U.S.-backed road map peace plan.
Skeptics of Sharon abound. Many doubt that he will make good on the promise
to dismantle most Gaza settlements. They note that he spoke of "planning"
an evacuation, not ordering it, and that he has set no timetable. Others
theorize that he's trying to divert attention from a corruption probe that
could bring his indictment.
Whatever his motivation, Sharon has raised a crucial issue that Israelis
must confront: If Israel wants peace, many if not all of the settlements--not
only in Gaza but the West Bank--must be removed.
The hawkish Sharon, known as an architect of the settler movement, faces
considerable opposition from hard-liners who view a Gaza withdrawal as a
devastating retreat. They're wrong. Voluntarily leaving Gaza not only enhances
security for Israelis, it erases a major friction point with the Palestinians.
Indeed, evacuating Gaza may be a relatively safe move for Sharon: A recent
poll showed about 6 in 10 Israelis favor uprooting the Gaza settlements.
Far more difficult would be the dismantling of many West Bank settlements,
which many Israelis consider their biblical birthright.
The settlements remain a clear obstacle to peace. So far, however, Israel
has done little but appease the hard-liners. Last October, for instance,
it announced plans to build new homes in the West Bank even as it pledged
to abide by the road map that calls for freezing settlements.
Ending the Gaza outposts would be, at least, a start. It would show Israelis--and
the world--that the government is willing to take painful unilateral steps
in search of secure borders and peace.
Copyright ©
2004, Chicago Tribune
|