Tue, Mar. 23, 2004
Israelis
promulgate extrajudicial murder and
the U.S. looks on
by Sherri Muzher
As an American of
Palestinian descent and Christian faith, I never cared much for the
ultimate goal of Hamas: to establish a religious state in Palestine.
But I find myself
angered and baffled at Israel's decision to assassinate Hamas founder
and spiritual leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin.
What is even more
baffling is the U.S. response, especially since its close ally, Ariel
Sharon, personally commanded this extrajudicial killing.
National security
adviser Condoleezza Rice said on NBC's Today that "it is very important
that everyone step back now and try now to be calm in the region. There
is always a possibility of a better day in the Middle East, and some of
the things being talked about by the Israelis... might provide new opportunities."
So the good ideas
will come from Israel, which just assassinated Yassin? I read that as
implying that if Palestinians react, they will be held responsible for
any fallout. Unbelievable.
One thing is certain
about the killing of the blind and quadriplegic Yassin: A peace agreement
that once seemed unlikely now seems unreachable in the near future. Sharon
is not stupid; his government expects retaliation. And the Israeli Defense
Force will use that retaliation as an excuse to kill more Palestinians.
It is a script that has played itself out for the last 31/2 years.
Each round becomes
more deadly, and each has far-reaching effects. There are now more than
700 Israeli checkpoints in the occupied territories. A barrier is being
built that has imprisoned many Palestinian villages and towns. The economic
siege continues, and a British report now compares the Palestinian malnourishment
levels to those in Africa. Still, the Palestinians have not been deterred
from demanding freedom and independence.
Extrajudicial killings
circumvent more than the negotiating table, though they certainly do that.
Israel sought to circumvent international law itself. It wishes to brandish
the stick and hand out the carrots.
The reasons for the
current uprising are many and understandable. Certainly, they should appeal
to any American. Consider freedom from occupation for a start. Freedom
from having their olive orchards uprooted, a source of income for many;
from having their homes demolished; from Israeli military checkpoints
on the road to and from all Palestinian cities, so that travelers are
held up from two to six hours on comparatively short journeys. Freedom
to bring up children as opposed to fighting as adults are, so that they
won't be subject to the humiliation their parents know now; freedom to
know the same kind of security Israelis want for themselves.
Three million Palestinians
have tolerated - in the overwhelming majority of cases, peaceably - the
denial of these freedoms for more than three decades. They ought to be
commended for their restraint all this time. There are an occasional few
young men who can no longer wait, however, with often tragic results.
It's been said that there is no enemy greater than the one who has nothing
to lose.
Some think Yassin's
death will put a stop to the Palestinian intifadah. But the intifadah
is bigger than Sheikh Yassin. It is bigger than Yasir Arafat. It is most
certainly bigger than Ariel Sharon. It involves the human spirit and the
desire to be free.
Rice was right to
say there is always a possibility of a better day in the Middle East.
When Israel ends the occupation and implements United Nations resolutions
as other nations are expected to, a better tomorrow may be realized. But
extrajudicial killings won't get us to that tomorrow. It's a shame the
U.S. government, with its silence in the fact of its ally's unjust acts,
doesn't understand that.
Sherri Muzher is
a media analyst in Mason, Mich.
2004
Philadelphia Inquirer and wire service sources.
|