
Setback for peace
Bush-Sharon agreement will not end the violence
Friday,
April 16, 2004
Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
The change
in the American approach, now to acquiesce in Israel's settlements
on the West Bank, constitutes a sharp turn in U.S. policy. President
Bush announced the move Wednesday during the visit of Israeli Prime
Minister Ariel Sharon to Washington.
It represented
the administration's abandonment of the road map approach to resolution
of the Israeli-Palestinian issue that Mr. Bush developed in coordination
with the United Nations, the European Union and Russia and announced
himself.
Mr. Sharon's
stated intention to withdraw Israel's forces and most of its settlements
from Gaza, the other territory along with the West Bank intended
for the Palestinians in the road map plan, would constitute a net
gain for the Palestinians from their present situation. But several
problems remain even with the Gaza part of the measure.
First, Mr.
Sharon still has to face a referendum May 2 within his own Likud
party on withdrawal from Gaza. He is uncertain of the party's support,
his position in internal Israeli politics weakened by a corruption
scandal.
Second, it
is not clear that all 20 Israeli settlements in Gaza, with a population
of about 8,000, would be withdrawn.
Third, although
Mr. Sharon says Israeli troops would be pulled from Gaza under his
plan, there would be nothing to stop them from returning should
Israel deem it important to its security.
The most important
part of the new deal is that, with the withdrawal of settlements
from Gaza, the Israelis will no longer consider themselves engaged
by the road map plan. Most importantly, as they see it, they would
be free of any obligation to remove their 230 settlements from the
West Bank.
That position
is basically what Mr. Bush agreed to with Mr. Sharon on Wednesday.
The objective
of all reasonable, realistic parties interested in achieving a sustainable
peace in the Middle East has been -- and is -- secure, recognized
Israeli and Palestinian states.
It is starkly
clear that the United States' signing on to a Sharon effort to get
the Palestinians to settle for Gaza, the poorest piece of real estate
in the package, just isn't going to work. It will not put an end
to fighting between Israelis and Palestinians. It will not help
bring peace to the region.
In its acceptance
of a bilateral U.S.-Israeli resolution of the extremely sensitive
issue of territory -- with the Palestinians absent from the table
-- and in its abandonment of the workable road map approach, the
administration only sets the scene for more Israeli-Palestinian
violence.
Against the
already-tense background of U.S.-Arab and Muslim relations brought
about by the Iraq war and occupation, Mr. Bush's change of policy
in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is purely and simply a catastrophe
in terms of prospects for long-term peace, and for the situation
of the United States in the Middle East. Why did he do it?
Copyright ©1997-2004
PG Publishing Co., Inc.
|