Risking peace
November
22, 2005
ARIEL SHARON IS A GAMBLER. Whether leading troops in battle against Arab
nations more than 30 years ago as an Israeli army commander or overseeing
the withdrawal of Israeli settlers from the Gaza Strip this summer as
prime minister of Israel, he has always been a daring tactician. The danger
of his latest maneuver, his dramatic decision Monday to bolt the Likud
Party, is that it will immobilize the Mideast peace process just when
it was showing some small signs of progress.
Sharon's decision, which capped two weeks of upheaval in Israeli politics,
will force new elections, probably in March. Palestinian parliamentary
elections scheduled for January already threaten the peace process, as
politicians worry more about getting elected than agreeing with their
foes.
Sharon is betting that his formation of a new party, more centrist than
the conservative Likud he co-founded three decades ago, will keep him
in power with a public that largely supported the Gaza pullout. Sharon
is 77. Two weeks ago, 82-year-old Shimon Peres was ousted as leader of
the Labor Party in favor of a politician who wanted Labor to secede from
Sharon's coalition government.
Between Peres' defeat and Sharon's decision came last week's hands-on
diplomacy by Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to achieve concrete progress
in the Israeli-Palestinian relationship. Rice extended her stay in Israel
to work through the night on an agreement that gives the Palestinians
control of the border between Gaza and Egypt.
Her persistence reflected the overdue reversal of the Bush administration's
unwillingness to become deeply involved in the peace process. U.S. secretaries
of State, especially Henry A. Kissinger and James A. Baker III, have been
important players in finding common ground between the Israelis and the
Arabs, including Palestinians. Their mere presence does not guarantee
success, but personal persuasion and attention to details can break a
stalemate.
Rice cannot be deeply involved at every step; President Clinton famously
pored over maps of a planned Israeli withdrawal from occupied West Bank
and Gaza in 2000 and did not broker an agreement. But the U.S. needs to
keep pushing the Palestinians to disarm the terrorists in their midst,
and the Israelis to stop allowing expansion of the West Bank settlements
on land seized in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War.
The European Union has agreed to provide monitors for the Gaza-Egypt crossing;
they need to beware the smuggling of weapons and terrorists into the territory.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Sharon must realize that their
election campaigns cannot be an excuse for paralyzing the overarching
issue of the establishment of a Palestinian state and the steps needed
on both sides to achieve that goal.
Copyright
2005 Los Angeles Times
|