
Rice's Mideast Minefield
By David Ignatius
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice is crossing a modest threshold in her efforts to mediate
the Palestinian problem: She is signaling her willingness to meet with
some members of the Hamas-backed "national unity government," even though
the Israelis have publicly opposed such a move.
Rice doesn't do
anything impulsively, least of all jump into the world's most intractable
conflict. And the space she has opened between U.S. and Israeli positions
is quite small. But as she prepares for another trip to the Middle East
late this week, Rice is sending the message that despite the complications
posed by the Palestinian unity government announced last
weekend, she is pressing ahead with her diplomatic efforts to broker
the creation of a Palestinian state.
Henry Kissinger
called this incremental approach "step-by-step diplomacy" when he was
secretary of state during the 1970s under Presidents Richard Nixon and
Gerald Ford. In Rice's case, there have been only baby steps so far.
But she appears to recognize that as she moves forward, she will need
to engage the Palestinians more broadly, even though these contacts
will upset some Israelis.
Rice's position
is that she won't refuse to talk to Palestinians just because they have
become members of the Hamas-dominated government, if their past public
statements have recognized Israel's right to exist. She is prepared,
for example, to meet the new Palestinian finance minister, Salam Fayyad,
a former World Bank economist. In a sign of the new U.S. policy, Fayyad
met yesterday with the U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, Jacob Walles,
according to Israeli press accounts. State Department officials also
don't rule out the possibility that Rice might meet with the new foreign
minister, Ziad Abu Amr, a former political science professor with a
doctorate from Georgetown who is friendly with Hamas.
Israel's policy,
by contrast, is that it "will not be able to work with the [Palestinian
unity] government or any of its ministers" until that government
recognizes Israel and renounces violence, according to a formal
statement issued last weekend. Israel isn't happy about the U.S.
deviation from this policy, but Israeli officials don't want to pick
a public fight at this point. They remain confident that the United
States and Israel share the same strategic goals, even if their tactics
have begun to differ.
Since direct talks
between Israelis and Palestinians are out, Rice will adopt the mediator's
role of holding separate "parallel communications" with both sides.
(In Kissinger's day, such meetings were known as "proximity talks.")
In these conversations, she will explore further what she calls the
"political horizon" for the Palestinian state. Specifically, she hopes
to develop a common agenda of issues that need to be resolved for that
state to exist. Her chief Palestinian counterpart, for now, will be
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, who is acceptable to Israel.
Rice will discuss
with Abbas and his advisers the tools that would allow a Palestinian
state to function effectively. For example, she plans to explore how
security might be maintained in a demilitarized Palestinian state --
including the role that might be played by outside security forces,
such as the European Union personnel who now act as monitors at checkpoints
at Gaza's border crossings with Egypt and Israel. A final item on Rice's
agenda will be steps to build solid governance in a future Palestinian
state, including financial and technical support for ministries.
To add some balance
to her effort, Rice is urging Arab states to reanimate their offer of
peace to Israel, as expressed in Saudi King Abdullah's 2002 peace initiative.
For example, Rice hopes the Arabs will discuss interim steps, such as
ending hostile propaganda and exchanging trade missions and other low-level
contacts. Rice's argument, in essence, is that a broad Arab-Israeli
engagement is necessary during efforts to solve the Palestinian
issue, instead of as icing on the cake after a peace deal is concluded.
Israel's worry is
that Rice is giving ground in ways that will only embolden Hamas. The
militant Islamic group won concessions from Abbas in the formation of
the unity government, including a right to submit any peace agreement
for a referendum or parliamentary vote that would include Palestinian
exiles. Abbas also failed to deliver on his promise that Hamas would
release captured Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit before formation of a
unity government. Meanwhile, Israeli security officials see Hamas expanding
its military force in Gaza, with 12,000 troops and longer-range missiles
with more-lethal warheads.
That's the deadly
standoff into which Rice is venturing as a mediator. She has started
down a road that even Kissinger couldn't navigate. But she understands
the diplomat's obligation that, having started a peace process, she
cannot now stop.
© 2007 The
Washington Post Company