
June 11, 2002
Clarifying the Bush Mideast
Plan
good host caters to his guests. We hope, then, that it
was hospitality, not a failure of leadership, that caused President Bush
to offer such different messages in public appearances with Hosni Mubarak
of Egypt on Saturday and Ariel Sharon, Israel's prime minister, yesterday.
In President Mubarak's company at Camp David, Mr. Bush said the United
States must start working immediately toward establishing a Palestinian
state. In the Oval Office yesterday with Mr. Sharon, the president said
that until there was sweeping reform of the Palestinian Authority there
could be no progress on Mideast peace.
Reforms are indeed
essential, but the United States must resist Mr. Sharon's demand that
until they are in place there can be no negotiations on a Palestinian
state.
Mr. Bush said late
last week that he would soon address the American people on how he plans
to move forward on the Middle East. His aides say that a statement, expected
in the next week or two, will call for parallel movement toward three
goals: improved security to end anti-Israel terror, rebuilding Palestinian
institutions to establish a Palestinian state, and political negotiations
between Israel and the Palestinians on all outstanding issues. A regional
conference of foreign ministers planned for this summer should go ahead
focused on these goals. Mr. Bush needs to make clear in his upcoming statement
that all three processes will move forward at the same time.
If it were up to
Mr. Sharon, there would be no discussion of Palestinian statehood until
Palestinian terror attacks ceased, Yasir Arafat was no longer in power
and a new, democratic Palestinian government had taken over. We too would
be happy to see those changes, but making them preconditions for negotiations
will only feed cynicism among Palestinians who believe that Israeli calls
for reform are nothing more than delaying tactics.
In fact, there have
been increased Palestinian calls for internal reform. Prominent Palestinians
have publicly said that the competing security services should be consolidated,
the judiciary made independent and corrupt economic officials fired. The
Bush administration is rightly seeking to build on indigenous Palestinian
efforts rather than imposing its own arrangements from outside.
The administration
has also correctly decided to steer away from the question of whether
Mr. Arafat stays in power by focusing on ways to help the Palestinians
restructure their institutions into more democratic and responsible ones.
Turning Mr. Arafat into the central issue would make it impossible for
other Palestinians to step forward. If all the concerned parties turn
their attention to institutional reform, the outcome may be that Mr. Arafat
finds himself without the power he has so badly abused.
Copyright
2002 The New York Times Company
|