A Mideast turnabout?
Tuesday,
August 20, 2002
MIDDLE EAST skeptics
were sounding the death knell for the latest deal to reduce Israeli-Palestinian
violence even before the first Israeli troops were pulled back. The
cease-fire plan is indeed ridden with uncertainties. But as the first
security agreement worked out directly between the contending parties
(rather than through U.S. mediation), since the start of the second
intifada in September 2000, it could mark the beginning of a more hopeful
phase of the crisis.
Drawbacks for the
scheme include the vow of Palestinian extremists -- including Hamas
and Islamic Jihad -- to ignore the terms worked out between Palestinian
Authority Interior Minister Abdel Razek Yehiyeh and Israeli Defense
Minister Benjamin Ben-Eliezer. Those opponents of any peace with Israel
are heartless enough to sabotage the cease-fire by continuing attacks
on Israeli targets, no matter what the cost in suffering by Palestinian
civilians from severe deprivation and loss of their freedom.
In exchange for
withdrawals of Israeli military in the Gaza Strip and Bethlehem, Palestinian
security forces are supposed to take steps to "reduce terror and violence"
in those truce areas, which presumably would be expanded to other parts
of the reoccupied West Bank if the initial plan succeeds. But the Palestinian
Authority's security capability has been largely destroyed in the Israeli
incursions focused on the terrorist infrastructure behind suicide bombings
and other outrages.
The prospect for
the cease-fire is not helped by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's coolness
toward it, and its entanglement in Israeli politics. Ben- Eliezer, of
the Labor Party, is seen positioning himself for a future bid to unseat
the Likud's Sharon, or to battle a politically reborn Benjamin Netanyahu.
If leaders on both
the Palestinian and Israeli sides push for the best interests of their
embattled peoples, this sensible phasing out of conflict will progress
as it should. We wish it were that simple.
©2002 San
Francisco Chronicle